Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tila Nguyen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Joyous 04:47, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Tila Nguyen

  • Delete Probable vanity page User:Joelkirk 16:59, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. Note that this VfD submission was made by anon User:63.207.13.177 and that user named JoelKirk does not exist (maybe a mistake by User:Joelkirk?). No vote yet. jni 17:21, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Forging signatures is a very bad thing to do though, please don't. Just register the user and log in! --fvw* 17:23, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)
  • Keep. Notable Import racing scene model. Silly girl though. - Ta bu shi da yu 17:27, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. We have articles on other porn stars, why not her? -℘yrop (talk) 17:29, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
    • This isn't a porn star, it's a girl who models for car advertisements. --fvw* 18:23, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)
  • Comment: JoelKirk does indeed exist, and the link has been corrected. Thanks.--User:Joelkirk 17:35, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep unless a good reason can be given not to. —RaD Man (talk) 19:20, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Reasonably notable within her field. --LeeHunter 22:59, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep, needs cleaning up. Megan1967 00:50, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, the article provides evidence of professional notability and cultural interest. Wyss 03:31, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete: pr0ncruft. Wile E. Heresiarch 07:27, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
    • (Methinks Wile E. Heresiarch understood my vote ;) Wyss 08:05, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
      • Given that there are a lot of car magazines and all of them feature scantily clad young women (and cars) on the cover, being a cover girl isn't evidence of notability or cultural interest. Wile E. Heresiarch 16:05, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. This person is a celebrity on the internet and a rising star --Rexrexilius 08:03, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Notable and verifiable. Bryan 16:53, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Pure keeper. Dan100 21:00, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep through and through. VfD is not cleanup. Use proper tagging. GRider\talk 18:47, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep for reasons already mentioned. J3ff 22:43, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep. Jayjg | (Talk) 17:58, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep too pretty to delete. Salazar 03:02, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.