Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany Hunter

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 09:45, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Tiffany Hunter

Non notable bio: as author writes: "Obscure adult entertainer on the Internet." -- (☺drini♫|☎) 00:04, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

• Comment - A search for "Tiffany Hunter" +adult on Google returns 518 results. A search for "Tiffany Hunter" returns 3,960 results. Rob Church ^{Talk | Desk} 00:11, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Non notable, non entity DV8 2XL 00:46, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete From the article: "obscure" and "relatively unknown". This is verging on Speedy territory. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:53, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Starblind expressed it eloquently. At least make an effort to persuade us not to delete a new article! -- llywrch 01:01, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete under Category A7. This article goes out of its way not to assert notability ie use of obscure and relatively unknown. Rob Church's Google search confirms the description. Capitalistroadster 01:12, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per Capitalistroadster. Jaxl | talk 02:52, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. NN. Although a Google Image Search = 'aaarhh... my eyes!' Cnwb 03:08, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
  • The only things that came up on a Google Image search for me were Tiffany Hunter Tiffany Hunter, Tiffany Hunter, Tiffany Hunter, Tiffany Hunter, and Tiffany Hunter, none of which would elicit that reaction. However, I didn't have "safe search" turned off. ☺ Uncle G 16:29:13, 2005-09-01 (UTC)
• Delete. nn. -- BD2412 ^talk 03:37, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn. --rob 05:49, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, asserts no notability at all. Note the use of: "obscure" and "relatively unkown". - Mgm|^(talk) 07:48, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - Should have been a CSD|A7 --Outlander 14:14, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete— non notable.

  Journalist ^C./ ^{Holla @ me!}

• Keep, she's not obscure at all.BillyCreamCorn 15:54, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Please supply proof that she's not obscure. Further research fails to show a listing on IMDB for her, & the first 2 hits for possible candidates from a Google search on "'Tiffany Hunter' +adult" are to an escort service (which provides a dead link supposedly to her web page), & a some guy's testimony that "she really likes to party". We've passed the criteria of notability & are now either at "verifiable" or "vanity". -- llywrch 17:19, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
  • BillyCreamCorn.... LOL. Delete nn Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 07:16, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Not notable in the least. -- Joshua Johaneman 18:41, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Not notable. -- JChamberlin 19:14, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as borderline speedy material. Hall Monitor 20:32, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn. -- DS1953 00:49, September 2, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.