Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany Beaudoin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Anjel. —Quarl (talk) 2007-04-26 06:59Z
[edit] Tiffany Beaudoin
meets neither WP:BIO or WP:MUSIC, completely unsourced. Delete. Jefferson Anderson 17:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
ATTENTION!
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}} |
- Weak delete without prejudice, says nothing that isn't in the Anjel article (which I think should be kept even though it technically violates WP:MUSIC) - iridescenti (talk to me!) 21:08, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Tiffany is a big part of the story with Anjel.69.114.197.41 02:39, 21 April 2007 (UTC)— 69.114.197.41 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep Tiffany is a artist and she was with anjels,also Nativida never came out with music and yet shes not being put up for deletion.Nycboi1 02:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)— Nycboi1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- KEEP she was a singer in a group,just like the anjel page this pae should be kep't to?70.23.28.187 06:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)— 70.23.28.187 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 08:16, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Anjel. Tiffany does not appear to be independently notable but since she is a possible search string a redirect is appropriate. Should she achieve independent notability at some point an article can be recreated. Otto4711 12:30, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect is good because she is apart of Anjel.69.114.197.41 02:22, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete:, completely fails WP:V, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC. There's nothing in the article about the subject other than her name and age. Furthermore, the Keep single-use !voters rely upon her membership in this Anjel group as proof of her notability, yet according to the group's article (which is in itself a gossipy mess worthy of AfD) it never actually released an album, had any airplay or performed a single concert ... so what? Under those circumstances, the group has no notability absent the members, and Beaudoin has no independent notability. RGTraynor 17:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment Anjel was nominated for AfD a couple of weeks ago, it just scraped a keep despite (or because of) a strong stench of sockpuppetry - iridescenti (talk to me!) 18:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I saw that, and agree entirely with your assessment. I have that in mind to file another AfD after a couple months when the dust settles a bit, and take a stand against the sockpuppets. RGTraynor 18:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Anjel was nominated for AfD a couple of weeks ago, it just scraped a keep despite (or because of) a strong stench of sockpuppetry - iridescenti (talk to me!) 18:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:MUSIC or redirect. The sock "votes" aren't helping, Tiffany. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 06:44, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.