Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tibetan Wikipedia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Wikis must meet the same notablility guidelines like WP:WEB as anything else. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tibetan Wikipedia
Non-notable Wikipedia edition - 200 articles are not enough. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 20:01, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Punkmorten (talk) 20:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. jj137 (Talk) 00:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, no evidence in the form of reliable, secondary coverage has been provided to show that this is a notable website. Picaroon (t) 23:23, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as it is getting there, per WP:OUTCOMES. English Wikipedia ought to have articles on every other WP with more than 100 or so articles. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 01:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- That seems a bit arbitrary - why make up random standards for judging Wikipedias when Wikipedia:Notability is a community-accepted standard that works for all organizations and entities? Now, I repeat, where's the coverage in reliable, secondary sources? Picaroon (t) 02:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete nn wiki, no sources This is a Secret account 05:03, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:WEB. Being a Wikimedia project is not an automatic claim to notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 09:17, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to Wikipedia 132.205.99.122 (talk) 21:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect or delete per above. Once you exclude links from within Wikimedia wikis, there are almost no ghits for this Wikipedia. Notability is highly doubtful. Someguy1221 (talk) 21:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. :-) Stwalkerster talk 14:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
