Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thursdaymas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Punkmorten 16:55, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thursdaymas

A neologism, not verifiable etc., delete. Sliggy 17:28, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Verbal exchanges often go undocumented for extended periods of time. --Walklikepeople 17:23, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia is not the place to document things that have never been documented before. See our Wikipedia:No original research official policy. Uncle G 21:17, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
  • The vote was discounted anyways since it was Walklikepeople's second edit. Punkmorten 16:55, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism which gets 0 Google hits, probably original research, certainly unverifiable. David Johnson [T|C] 17:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable. Stifle 01:21, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable unverifiable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-07 01:25Z
• Patent nonsense. Delete, candidate for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 19:26, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.