Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thunderdome (communal)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. – Alphax τεχ 05:07, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Thunderdome (communal)
Probably the same person is back with the Thunderdome (communal).Vanity.
To quote User:HorsePunchKid: I can't find anything notable about this commune whatsoever, and I've lived in Champaign for 25 years. There are dozens of houses like this all over campus, and this one doesn't seem to be any more noteworthy than any other. This looks like vanity, and I suggest this article be deleted.
Also, move Thunderdome (arena) back to Thunderdome and I suggest verbally warning User:Rc251, this is the second time that someone has tried this. In addition, the arena is way mroe famous then a communal. --fpo 05:50, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I believe that I can vote, and vote I am. Vanity, and not notable --fpo 05:50, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm not terribly well-versed with the policies here, but I think that resurrecting a deleted article with the same content it had after the decision was made to delete it is grounds for speedy deletion. As such, I'm going to add the {{db}} tag. —HorsePunchKid→龜 05:56, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 23:28, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Thunderdome (communal)
I can't find anything notable about this commune whatsoever, and I've lived in Champaign for 25 years. There are dozens of houses like this all over campus, and this one doesn't seem to be any more noteworthy than any other. This looks like vanity, and I suggest this article be deleted. —HorsePunchKid→龜 05:34, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, but keep the disambig page as it will have three completely diff. articles when i write the thunderdome (arena) one. --fpo 05:50, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity. This is an article about a bunch of guys who lived in a share-house. This is nowhere near encyclopaedic. --bainer (talk) 07:24, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Total vanity page — Linnwood (talk)
23:04, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
