Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threshing-board/Old
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#G6 - uncontroversial maintenance. Pedro : Chat 08:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Threshing-board/Old
Unneeded sub page. -- Alan Liefting- (talk) - 03:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- The link to the page is not showing correctly. I am referring to Threshing-board/Old
- Weak keep- I think this is a semi-useful disambig page, and we should keep it. Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 03:23, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- keep I don't see why this is more unnecessary than other disambig pages. Merkin's mum 03:29, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Eh? How else are we supposed to disambiguate between things called "Old"? PC78 (talk) 04:07, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Standard disambiguation page. Zagalejo^^^ 04:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Keep Wha? Unless we're hiring Miss Cleo to manually redirect incoming searches, I think this is a somewhat necessary disambig. Bfigura (talk) 06:01, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as leftover from a translation per Talk:Threshing-board/Old, thus eligible for G6.
- Delete, I am confused by this discussion since it is not a disambiguation page. But this is not needed in any way. Punkmorten (talk) 07:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.