Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three beautiful things

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 05:48, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Three beautiful things

A supposed 2004 cult, size unknown, started in England. Unfortunately, only 3 google hits for "Three beautiful things" +Cult, and only 8 for "Three beautiful things" +"Clare Grant" (the supposed founder). Non-notable, essentially unverifiable. Delete. Meelar (talk) 18:13, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-verfiable, not trace of this group on the web. Brand new and perhaps a vanity. -Willmcw 19:57, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Friday 21:07, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete certainly a vanity page. --Zappaz 21:52, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This is a definite movement in the sout-east. The first two statements above contradict each other -- there either is web reference or there is not. If these contributors can decide to delete an entry, then I must state they have too much power.
• Delete. Badly written, and probably not notable. "Clare Grant is the one that done it." is particularly bad. If it was better written, I might be persuaded to change my vote. Themindset 23:14, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity page for this blog and nothing more. Meelar, be careful with searches like that... supporters of a "cult" are not likely to describe themselves as such. ;) —HorsePunchKid→龜 00:32, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable movement. Dcarrano 00:42, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable non-movement; HorsePunchKid is right, it's just blog-vanity.--Pharos 03:17, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable cult. JamesBurns 06:53, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. V. interesting to see how this site works. Someone has add the "Clare Grant is the one that done it" bit. I agree it is badly written, but can it not be edited? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.44.249.237 (talk • contribs) 11:31, July 16, 2005
  • It certainly can be edited. If you would like to establish the noteworthiness of the subject, now is the time to do it! Just keep in mind that cleaning up the writing will probably not be enough to save this from deletion. —HorsePunchKid→龜 21:15, July 16, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.