Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas lengyel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thomas lengyel

Thomas lengyel (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Information in article fails WP:ATT. Even then I think subject would not meet guidelines in WP:BIO. Nv8200p talk 19:54, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 21:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete' He is not an academic, he's an undergraduate who has apparently just received his BA degree. The nearest he;s gotten to be a scholar is to have taken a class with one/ Of the three references given, one is the general site for his college, and two are the student newspaper reports of a student variety show and a performance. He claims he's notable, so i don't want to call it a Speedy, but it's impossible to give the claim any credence. Zero published works--I can find no hits for his claimed book.. I suggest we remove him from the academic deletion sorting list. he's no more an academic than anyone who has a college degree. DGG 05:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Notability is claimed but not established. The Google hits for "Thomas Lengyel" that appear to be about the correct person are trivial; e.g, being the subject of a photo taken in a journalism class. WorldCat can't find his supposed book. Article created by User:Tlengyel, suggesting a conflict of interest, and the other users who have expanded the article and removed the AFD template have no other edits. EALacey 11:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.