Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Viten

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedied by User:Danny. This has been speedied six times in the last 24 hours. Perhaps an admin could {{deletedpage}} this and protect? Jamie ^{(talk/contribs)} 12:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thomas Viten

Vanity page and also patent nonsense. Ben W Bell 11:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Delete of course. I'm surprised it's not a speedy. Robin Johnson 11:30, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete. I did this as a speedy delete yesterday, but now it's back up with this notice: "Stupid Wikipedia Admins. You can never stop us! MWUAHAHAHA!! Sgn.: The Wikipedia Haxxer Gang". I'm sure the "Wikipedia Haxxer Gang" is very proud of themselves, and will be toasting one another as they sip their 2% lowfat milk at the elementary school this afternoon. --MisterHand 11:37, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.