Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Sagstad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 06:57, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thomas Sagstad

Thomas Sagstad (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

WP:Notability MasterDarksol (talk) 17:04, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Lack of coverage in reliable secondary sources. Google turns up 54,100 hits of which none seem to be reliable. —97198 talk 14:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Verifiability is an issue for this article which does not cite any reliable sources. Stifle (talk) 22:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

• I know Thomas Sagstad, he is a friend of mine. I talked and asked him for details when I was writing this article. Is that enough for reliable source? You don't need to have a solid proof for this kind of article... If you search google you can find at least 5 web pages about Thomas Sagstad easily. Nemesis5858 (talk) 12:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, since he is Norwegian I used Norwegian-search engine Sesam with a news search, and only two hits on him (see [1]). One was a different guy, one was a paid advert. Arsenikk (talk) 11:06, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - per WP:MUSIC, he might have notability in some night clubs in Oslo or somewhere like that but not for this encyclopedia. I am notable in my home for example. ⇨ EconomistBR ⇦ Talk 02:54, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.