Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Ormson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mailer Diablo 15:55, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thomas Ormson

Non-notable actor. Was prodded, deprodded, and re-prodded by another editor. Kimchi.sg 07:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment: I deprodded another couple of articles (Aaron Livesy, Danny Webb) which had been prodded by the same user without an edit comment. I think that is rather bad form, and it shouldn't even be considered a valid prodding. Those were for another English soap opera character and the actor playing that role (on Emmerdale). up+land 08:55, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree that prods should all include comments. You could mention this to the user on his/her talk page. JChap (talk • contribs) 01:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep for consistency: This actor apparently played a character for which there is an article, David Platt in Coronation Street for ten years. I'm not convinced that we don't already have too much TV cruft, but as long as we keep any Star Trek actor or character (and there is no realistic chance we will get those deleted), it would be a case of systemic bias to treat material concerning popular series like these ones differently. The only difference I can see is that Star Trek has a geek appeal that long-running (and exported) English soap operas like Emmerdale or Coronation Street do not have. up+land 08:55, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per Uppland Jcuk 11:01, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep as a notable non-Romulan. 205.157.110.11 15:50, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep as per Uppland's comments. Scorpiondollprincess 16:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. JChap (talk • contribs) 01:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.