Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Kipphut

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Kurykh 00:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thomas Kipphut

Thomas Kipphut (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable and it is the resume for a user. The same content is listed on the User's Talk Page and the User Page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Thomaskipphut http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Thomaskipphut Quasispace 01:14, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

• Very Strong Delete A resume as a wikipedia article? THis is almost funny... Calgary 08:11, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete Non notable, COI, Per nom& above. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 11:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, no sources and its just a resume, a bad one at that too. Callelinea 14:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia publishes articles, not resumes. Spellcast 19:17, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete resume. Oysterguitarist 21:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.