Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas E. Brayton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PeaceNT 16:09, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thomas E. Brayton

Thomas E. Brayton (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Seemingly fails WP:BIO. It is nicely referenced, but, really, what makes this fellow so special we should have an encyclopedia entry on him? As far as I can tell, nothing. Biruitorul 22:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. I have to agree with the nominator, this is well-written, nicely referenced, and doesn't meet WP:BIO. And I'm sure if there was any further notability available, the careful author would have included it. This seems like some kind of geneaological project offshoot. Accounting4Taste 23:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Acounting4Taste. Stifle (talk) 19:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Agree this looks like genealogy. Has anyone tried to get in touch w/ the author to suggest wikitree or genealogy.wikia --lquilter 19:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Nice article, but doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO. --Kudret abi^Talk 04:13, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.