Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas C Hewitt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 04:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thomas C Hewitt

Thomas C Hewitt (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

per WP:BIO - not notable. Contested prod. Javit 12:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Also WP:SPAM (for more info, see . . . ) and probably WP:AUTO/WP:COI (authored by User:juneandtom). --Evb-wiki 13:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete vanity nonsense. Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 13:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Could find nothing (other than this Wikipedia article) in Google or Proquest. Sounds like he hangs around with noted musicians and works in the trade, but we need multiple reliable and independent sources to be cited in a bio article, not just the subjects own autobiographical account. Perhaps get a press agent and get some articles written in magazines which cover his type of music, then come back. Edison 13:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: Non-notable, per nom. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 15:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Notable enough for me. Stop trying to ruin Wikipedia by deleting everything. If you don't like an article then don't view it but don't stop others who want it. Xanucia 23:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. I will only bother to point the above user in the direction of WP:NPA. Please read WP policies and guidelines on what should be kept and deleted. --Javit 23:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I checked Google web, news and books and the only results were false positives, as well as three online British newspapers without finding him (with of course the burden on the creator to provide sources present). Forget notability—for the moment the content is unverified, with failed searches implying it is unverifiable.--Fuhghettaboutit 00:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 20:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.