Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Bollinger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 is almost Singularity 08:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thomas Bollinger

Thomas Bollinger (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A non-verifiable biography about a photographer. A google search brings up a two or three personal websites containing portfolios. There are no reviews or criticisms from a third party, making it both non-notable and in violation of the guidelines for WP:BIO. Expletusnox 05:34, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete The lack of third-party reliable sources for this subject is a major concern here. --Siva1979Talk to me 05:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Despite doing a very good job of bigging up Bollinger's photographic achievements, e.g. "photographing the President at the White House" in a paparazzi-like shot of Bush descending from a helicopter, the article doesn't manage to assert his notability in any meaningful way. Without independent outside sources, it's difficult to find a reason to keep this article here, and, as Google also brings up no independent references, I am forced to vote for deletion. —Cuiviénen 05:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, nothing on Google News Archive at all. --Dhartung | Talk 06:19, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom...obvious NN. Jmlk17 06:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Could possibly appear to be notable, but with a lack of references and sources to back up the claims to notability then the article does not meet the requirements in WP:Notability Ozgod 12:29, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.