Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Blacke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:45, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thomas Blacke

non notable vanity and using Wikipedia to advertiseGator (talk) 19:10, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom.Gator (talk) 19:10, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete more vanispamcruftisement Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 19:14, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, per above. Ajwebb 19:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, textbook vanity/ad page. I like that word Guy used though. Snurks ^{T C} 19:24, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Self-promotion. Delete unless rewritten. - Mike Rosoft 19:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, <4000 people have been to his 2 webpages, according to the counter. -Andrew 19:39, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nominator. --IByte 20:33, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, this page is vanity and self-promotion. (aeropagitica) 21:24, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable --Quarl 21:30, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom - FrancisTyers 02:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per CSD:A7, non notable. -- ReyBrujo 03:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.