Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Is Otakudom (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] This Is Otakudom

This Is Otakudom (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No independant sourcing to show any sort of notability to this. TexasAndroid 18:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

• Link to previous AfD - Here's a link to the previous AfD. --BlindEagle^{talk~contribs} 18:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - the previous AfD did not convince me why this article should be kept. Also, the article has not provided any evidence of notability or secondary and verifiable sources which is required for notability. --BlindEagle^{talk~contribs} 18:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Previous AFD said no concensus. Problem is that a parody fan dub, while often fun (and sometimes even funny), is often not notable. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 18:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable, and still no reliable sources. IMHO the first AfD was pretty convincing to delete: 3080 Google hits isn't anything special, and it's down to 1,330 today, with 241 of those being unique. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete article has no verifiable sources to demonstrate notability, as such it should be deleted. TonyBallioni 22:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per others. Fails WP:FICT. Doctorfluffy 05:39, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.