Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Catastrophe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] This Catastrophe
NN band per WP:MUSIC. Contested prod. Barely claims importance at all, but claims to have an album out so I thought speedy was inappropriate. delete. Mangojuicetalk 20:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. —dustmite 23:47, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- delete should be speedied for A7. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
why should this article be deleted? i have produced for this band?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Liamgaughan (talk • contribs) .
2. Self-promotion. You are free to write about yourself or projects you have a strong personal involvement in. There! wikipedia says this article can exist!
A7 good point- but then, unremarkable is simply a matter of opinion, isn't it. I'm pretty sure this band are remarkable to some people lol —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.69.94.242 (talk • contribs) .
How about, the day that wikipedia gets desperate for the 300kb or so, of space that this article takes up, they could remove it? ITs not like its a fake band, and its not harming anyone. (liamgaughan) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Liamgaughan (talk • contribs) .
-
- Comment: The problem with your reasoning is that Wikipedia has certain standards to keep. Specifically, only encyclopedic, verifiable information is appropriate. Without these standards, Wikipedia would turn into LiveJournal or MySpace. This band simply doesn't belong in an ecyclopedia. Also, please remember to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~) to save people the work of signing them for you. —dustmite 04:18, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.