Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Think Floyd
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 20:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Think Floyd
Pink Floyd tribute band tagged as non-notable for a year and as an advertisement since December. Procedural nomination; prod was removed by anon ip with no explanation. —BradV 15:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. No notability. Does not even contain an assertion of notability.--Michig (talk) 15:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Per Bradv15 and Michig Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:40, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 16:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Keep - Meets WP:MUSIC per [1] and [2], [3]—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisdom89 (talk • contribs)Changed to delete per below. Wisdom89 (T / C) 02:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- Comment. 1 and 2 just look like regurgitations of promotional news releases for their gigs. 3 is a fan review, not a professional BBC review.--Michig (talk) 17:04, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 17:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:MUSIC and lacks WP:RS Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 02:13, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Although I have not looked at the page in a while and had missed the concerns over style - which I agree needs sorting out. This is one of a number of pages related to Pink Floyd tribute bands but the only one proposed for deletion - Either keep and sort out the content or look to delete all tribute band content (for all bands) for consistency!Jschwa1 (talk) 21:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- The status of other articles has little bearing on the status of this particular article. The presence of coverage in reliable sources, rather than a surface similarity to other articles, is the main criterion for determining the notability of a subject. – Black Falcon (Talk) 17:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.