Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thessalmonster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:03, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thessalmonster

Thessalmonster (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Group of Dungeons & Dragons monster claimed by one character in one setting to have been created by them. A brief mention at the article on liches, under the brief description of the lich Thessal, is probably more than enough. No evidence of third party coverage. J Milburn (talk) 10:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete — non-notable. Mention in a list. March is D&D Spring Cleaning Month; you can help. Cheers, Jack Merridew 11:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
• Close and propose a merge or a redirect at the article talk page. no need to bring this here.DGG (talk) 17:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Disagree, even a redirect is useless, in my opinion. J Milburn (talk) 18:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, a brief mention in the lich article is already more than is needed for a trivial monster. --Ig8887 (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete — as above. shadzar-talk 22:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Not enough information to make it very informative. Waste of kb --Jammy (talk) 22:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. —Gavin Collins (talk) 11:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete no independent coverage. Fails WP:RPG/N and WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 11:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.