Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thermophobic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - Yomangani^talk 17:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thermophobic

Seems like a hoax; a Google of "thermophobic" and "orgasm" reveals a whopping 2 results. The article doesn't provide much more context to work with. Crystallina 02:19, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Cbrown1023 02:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep page was vandalized (diff) and has now been reverted. --Daniel Olsen 02:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep After two years of sex therapy, you too can finally achieve the thermophobic orgasm. Google hits for "thermophobic" and "organism" seem to confirm that this is genuine.-- IslaySolomon | talk 02:56, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• keep. I've restored the pre-vandalism text of the article. Now, although brief, it makes sense. The AfD nomination was placed on a vandalized article. Please check article histories before nominating for deletion. Unfocused 03:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, per Daniel Olsen. hateless 03:50, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Shouldn't this be at Wikitionary? It sounds like just a definition. TJ Spyke 04:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment, agreed. As you pointed out this, I shall not participate in this AFD. --Terence Ong _{(T | C)} 05:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment True, as it stands, this article is just a one line definition. However, I think this can be addressed by expansion rather than deletion. -- IslaySolomon | talk 05:40, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• I'm gonna go with Keep, per the other keeps †he Bread 06:48, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki to Wiktionary or expand. Guy 11:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I have expanded the article to include examples of thermophobic stuff. Kavadi carrier 13:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and kudos for the cleanup. Sandstein 23:38, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep post-expanded and newly referenced version by Kavadi. Solid work. Kuru ^talk 01:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, though I would fact check the business about dandruff. - Smerdis of Tlön 20:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as above. Robovski 00:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.