Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theory-literature

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 01:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Theory-literature

It was tagged for speedy, which I didn't think was appropriate. The reason was: "just a heap of facts, covered in other topic areas, no pages link to this article". No vote. enochlau (talk) 23:50, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete; article looks really empty when reading; no trace of "theory-literature" on the web. Schutz 00:27, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep Dfinitely not a speedy but needs references. The term does seem to exist e.g. [1] Dlyons493 Talk 00:42, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism / original research. Term is not in use in English in this way. Lukas 11:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unverifiable original research. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 20:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. original research.Obina 21:54, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research, among other things. Stifle 09:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.