Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theomatics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Linuxbeak | Talk 21:46, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Theomatic

tagged as a speedy which IMO it is not. As writen it is a dictdef, and unsourced. It should be transwikied to wictionary, or deleted if not wanted on wictionary, unless expanded into an encyclopedic article. DES ^(talk) 06:16, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

• Transwiki as per nom. --Dvyost 06:23, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
• After a complete rewrite from sources, Weak keep and rename to theomatics. Uncle G 13:48, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete freestylefrappe 18:04, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Given that the article has (as I noted) been completely rewritten from sources, and thus the aforementioned rationales (relating to it being a stub and unsourced) no longer apply, what is your rationale? Uncle G 01:34, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep it. After the rewrite, looks encyclopedic to me. More of a concept than a definition. More that a dictionary definition.--Gaff ^{talk 00:13, 15 October 2005 (UTC)}
• Keep It After rewrite. 67.41.180.149 20:13, 15 October 2005 (UTC)Tom

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.