Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theological Education Institute

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete as blatant advertising. Guy (Help!) 08:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Theological Education Institute

Theological Education Institute (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Probable conflict of interest by primary author Jeremy.rankin (talk · contribs). The article advertises a Christian school and gives external links, but does not assert notability and does not address the topic from a neutral point of view. Shalom Hello 19:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - The name makes it appear to be an educational institution, but the website suggests that it's really a nonnotable one-man Christian ministry.--orlady 22:45, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete -User:Jeremy.rankin is almost certainly the son of John C. Rankin, the man who runs the subject entity. He states on his user page that he was born August 3, 1985 and the bio page for John C. Rankin on the subject entity's website states: "He and his wife Nancy were married in 1977 and have three sons (1978, 1981 and 1985) and one daughter (1990)." We definitely have a case of WP:COI. More importantly, there is no notability asserted for the subject entity or for Mr. Rankin. According to my google search, notability cannot be established. This meets CSD A7, as it is an article about a person, group, company, or web content that does not assert the importance of the subject.OfficeGirl 23:02, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This article is simply not good enough for Wikipedia. We need better articles. Non-notable, crap, spam....delete as soon as possible. RS1900 05:07, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.