Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thelston Payne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Strong Consensus Keep, after nomination withdrawn, for rewrite. Xoloz 17:11, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thelston Payne

nn person spam Ian13 (speak!) 20:41, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Ian13 (speak!) 20:41, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

  I change to Keep and Expand, it seems I was a little hasty. Ian 13 22:14, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and expand. Bring this to Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket to fix. --howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 21:29, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Gets more than 500 Google hits with lots of data. Verifiable and more notable than the average Pokémon. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 22:22, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Pokemon are part of a television series, several movies and computer games and a trading card franchise which makes me believe Pokemon are far more notable, even though - like you - I don't like the fact they are. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:38, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, no case has been made for this person's non-notability. Bryan 00:39, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. It's up to the article's creator to provide sources and prove the person IS notable. Playing 7 internationals and 1 test, though, appears to not make him a one-day fly and thus notable if verified.
• Keep I don't know much about cricket, but he appears both real and notable. [1] --Bachrach44 03:58, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Cleanup, and delete if not improved in a reasonable time. Too little information at the moment. - Andre Engels 08:43, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Please leave this to us in WP:Cricket. Some of us create the stubs while the others expand them to articles. This will be expanded in due course. This person in an international cricketer. Tintin 14:31, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. As per Tintin. --HighHopes ^{(T)⋅(+)⋅(C)⋅(E)⋅(P)} 21:16, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep especially as I've expanded it a bit. Is there really a point to this nomination now, now that the nominee has withdrawn his delete suggestion? Sam Vimes 00:03, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.