Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thelemapedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thelemapedia

Thelemapedia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Delete- site does not appear to meet WP:WEB - advert? there are also quite a few external links to the site. Jefferson Anderson 17:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Add WP:VANITY to the list, as the creator of the article Ashami was also the creator of the web site.[1] —Hanuman Das 07:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - after actually reading the applicable policies, I can't in good faith vote keep. Frater Xyzzy 15:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC) Strong keep - one of the more significant Thelemic resources on the web. Frater Xyzzy 18:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. (Disclosure: I've contributed to this article, but at the time I was not very familiar with WP policy and didn't realize the site wasn't notable enough for inclusion. Now I know better.) —Hanuman Das 00:45, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - An excellent resource of rare and hard to obtain material. Probably should be toned down a bit so it doesn't seem like an advert. However, I do find fault with people who directly cite the website as a source rather than entering the actual title, ISBN and page number of the source and then hyper-linking to the site - if the site was to go down quite a bit of things would be improperly sourced as a result. - WeniWidiWiki 18:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep , but rewrite to keep out npov issues. FirefoxMan 00:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - only sources seem to be the site itself. There are no reviews or mentions in media as required by WP:WEB. Ekajati (yakity-yak) 14:42, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.