Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thejas Online

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-27 01:53Z

[edit] Thejas Online

Thejas Online (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Originally speedy requested as G11 [1], tagged as wikify and importance [2], with tags later being removed [3]. I can't personally verify whether or not it will meet WP:NOTE, but I feel this might not be the case. Sigma 7 02:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Update: Thejas is now tagged for proposed speedy deletion, for the same reason as this article. It was originally requested for speedy delete as well, and that tag was removed improperly. --Sigma 7 22:02, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Bigtop 02:29, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

*Merge with Thejas. Delta Tango • Talk 02:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC) Delta Tango • Talk 08:10, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Redirect to Thejas. No merge needed. --- RockMFR 02:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

*Redirect per RockMFR. Sr13 (T|C) 06:02, 22 December 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete because Thejas is gone. Sr13 (T|C) 22:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete both Both articles have been around over 3 months and contain virtually no useful content.DaveApter 11:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Thejas is not nominated. You'll have to nominate it first (in a separate discussion). --- RockMFR 16:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Thejas is now prodded speedied, with the prod reason linking to this discussion. --Sigma 7 22:02, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. --- RockMFR 02:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, little to no evidence of notability. Seraphimblade 03:42, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Thejas is now gone, take his brother too. Maddy626 09:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, not even worthy of a stub. SkierRMH,22:41, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. utcursch | talk 11:44, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.