The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:09, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
I had a brief conversation with the contributing parties, but ultimately, I can't find any establishment of notability or verfiability, so I'm reluctantly placing it here. --Bachrach44 16:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Delete - absolutely gorgeous building, absolutely no encyclopedic merit. - GlenTC(Stollery) 18:34, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Delete without prejudice; if anyone can write an article that is verifiable and actually says something interesting, they should. Mangojuicetalk 18:35, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.