Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The shitty asshole

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 00:56, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] The shitty asshole

Experimental noise band started in late 2003. Release catalog eztends to a demo tape and CD-Rs only. Not my definition of notable. Thryduulf 01:28, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Not a slam dunk either way. If you wade through the porn sites that are included in the search results, Google does show several references to this group. I would keep it if it can be expanded and made NPOV. -Rholton 02:06, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Everything appears somewhere on google. Non-signed bands don't appear in wikipedia. And signed bands don't release CD-Rs. -R. fiend 02:52, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, NN - Also please note that Shitty Asshole is a duplicate entry. Delete this as well. K1Bond007 03:15, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as not notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:17, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- DCEdwards1966 05:53, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Wipe and flush. Possibly the name has some deep artistic meaning, but my theory is that it's their only claim to fame, and it's not enough. Andrewa 09:00, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I have much pleasure in casting my first ever vote in the direction of deleting this entry. --Historian 10:49, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Although again with the indie band discussion. Where do we draw the line for a bands notability. Inter 10:52, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: There's another thing that concerns me here. We have no verification that this band even exists, but we're publicising their (very small) website on which they offer "presales" of (very) limited release CD-Rs, for example "10 only, 2 left". Now, if you sent your dough and nothing arrived, would you complain? I'm not saying this is a scam, but I can't find any evidence that it isn't, either. Andrewa 11:33, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, duplicate article. Megan1967 02:10, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable, and gross. Jayjg | (Talk) 22:52, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• FAO administrators: I've set Shitty Asshole to redirect to this article (it was a duplicate) pending the outcome of this VfD. If it is deleted then this page should be deleted as well. Note that Shitty Asshole is itself the subject of a VfD. Thryduulf 12:44, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - not really an article for Wikipedia - Master Of Ninja 09:13, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

+ Delete - what rubbish Brookie

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.