Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The second dimension
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 16:14, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The second dimension
recently speedy deleted as "non-notable" and recreatged. IMO this does not quslify under the speedy delete criteria but neither does it appear to meet WP:WEB. Delete unless relaibel sources are cited to estblish notability. DES (talk) 18:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Speedy Delete, per nom. --DelftUser 18:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC)- Comment: Please clarifiy which of the speedy deletion criteria you feel this site meets. Stifle 11:33, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. --DelftUser 19:06, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: Please clarifiy which of the speedy deletion criteria you feel this site meets. Stifle 11:33, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. PJM 19:00, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete advertisement for a nn site. Ruby 19:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
*Speedy Delete Non-notable website, as per WP:WEB. (aeropagitica) 21:29, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment: Please clarifiy which of the speedy deletion criteria you feel this site meets. Stifle 11:33, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Further to my previous vote, I have reviewed the site and had a second thought. My first was that the site merited a {{db-empty}} tag for failing to assert the notability of the website, as per WP:WEB. My second thought is to reduce the vote to delete in order to give the author and/or other minded contributors time to review the website and include its notable elements in the article text. I concede that the article informs me of a website of which I was not previously aware. I will also point out that the article is devoid of all mention of the notability of this website amongst its peers. (aeropagitica) 17:42, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 23:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable. Wikipedia is not the Web Yellow Pages. Ikkyu2 05:37, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I originally nominated the page for speedy deletion; in hindsight, it doesn't actually meet the CSD, because it does assert notability. -Ikkyu2 01:18, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.