Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The number 2 show!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete by Fang Aili. --Coredesat talk 05:17, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The number 2 show!

Fails WP:WEB; not-notable. I PRODed but PROD removed by author without comment. BlueValour 02:22, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:WEB. Only 70 Google results [1]. Also, Alexa ranking of 261,303 [2]--TBCTaLk?!? 02:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - even worse; I think only 2 of those hits relate to this show. BlueValour 02:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment (by creator) There are so many other podcast descriptions on Wikipedia why is this one being deleted? I mean just look at the 'podcast' category and you will see a ton there. I don't see why this entry should be discriminated against based on it's age or listener base.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ootoowak (talk • contribs) 02:30, 27 Jun 2006 (UTC)

• Comment No discrimination; as we find 'em we assess 'em. BlueValour 02:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment (edit conflict) The other podcast articles that don't satisfy WP:WEB will likely be nominated in the future when someone sees them. TheJC ^Talk_{Contributions} 02:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Article does not establish notability. TheJC ^Talk_{Contributions} 02:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no notability asserted. Fails WP:WEB. --Coredesat talk 02:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per Coredesat. —EdGl 03:08, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable podcast. Justifying existence on the basis of other podcasts is not itself an argument for retention. WP:WEB refers.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  04:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The article makes no claim to notability for this podcast. --Metropolitan90 06:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. No apparent notability - my only regret is that I have but one vote for deletion. WilyD 14:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, or userfy if requested by creator. May be re-created without prejudice in the future when it becomes notable. (I must say that "Not setting the bar too high the couple fumbles their way through webpages and sound quality all the while just enjoying each others company and conversation" suggests to me that producing the podcast is probably more enjoyable than listening to it). Dpbsmith (talk) 19:46, 27 June 2006 (UTC) P. S. User:Ootoowak, be aware you have a "user page" on Wikipedia—which you are currently not using You can use your user page for anything you like within fairly broad limits; in particular, unlike articles, you can use user pages for personal self-expression. Material about your podcast is perfectly suitable for your user page. Just go to User:Ootoowak and click "edit this page," just like any other. Dpbsmith (talk) 19:50, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - tagged as such - creator has blanked all content. BlueValour 20:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.