Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The nobleman and knight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:27, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] The nobleman and knight

nom&vote delete. not an encyclopdia article. Gaff ^{talk 19:06, 15 October 2005 (UTC)}

• Delete per nomination. - Gator1 19:09, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• I'm STILL writing it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Better yet F&^%% all of you. You don't like you write it!
• Delete. This does, despite the silliness above, starts out as a good-faith attempt to write an article. It degenerates into talking about jousting with lobsters. I was concerned it might be a copyvio, but it doesn't turn up on Google. Even with that aside, without any referencing whatsoever, it is original research which is not what Wikipedia seeks. I suspect that the questions that could be asked by this article are already answered elsewhere. -Splash^talk 20:10, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This information can be found in better-organized form at knight, sword, and war horse. Denni☯ 00:41, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.