Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The most beautiful Arab cities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-04-26 07:51Z

[edit] The most beautiful Arab cities

The most beautiful Arab cities (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Opinion. Original research and inherently non-neutral. Deprodded w/o comment. Pan Dan 22:43, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Unreferenced original research. Who says these are the most beautiful Arab cities? --Strangerer (Talk) 23:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - every person on the planet will have a different opinion on this - iridescenti (talk to me!) 23:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Inherently not NPOV. --Xnuala (talk) 00:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for obvious reasons. JuJube 01:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - Alternatively, if someone felt like taking the time to organize and collect the information, perhaps it could be changed into: "List of cities in the Middle east ordered by GDP" or "List of cities in the Middle East ordered by development investments" etc. --Remi 02:03, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - no contest here. The fact that I disagree with some of the listings is perhaps a sign of the problems :) BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Always going to be POV with this title. BTLizard 15:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for obvious reasons. Original research and not neutral. —Anas ^talk? 16:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, subjective and unsourced/unsourceable, violates WP:NPOV. NawlinWiki 18:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, obviously. Also, this Unites person does nothing else other than vandalising articles about middle-east countries with false data. Frigo 11:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - An opinion piece better suited for someone's blog. --Oakshade 02:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.