Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The grady institute

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-13 23:17Z

[edit] The grady institute

The grady institute (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails WP:Notability, both WP:ORG and WP:WEB. Probable WP:COI as well, per Special:Contributions/Lifeshift. — coelacan talk — 00:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete as non-notable. Google search for "The Grady Institute" gets 4 hits, no sources are provided in article. Natalie 00:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete In addition to the above, apparently there are zero sites that link to the website [1], no Google news hits [2], nothing in Google books (the three books are all false positives to a 1912 institute) and only one hit for all blogs [3].--Fuhghettaboutit 01:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable. Doesn't look salvageable in any form. — BillC talk 01:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom Josh Parris 03:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Looks like a cut and paste, too. Realkyhick 05:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. John Vandenberg 06:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per WP:NOT.TellyaddictEditor review! 16:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete for notability. (I seem to be saying that a lot today.) Philippe Beaudette 18:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. —dima/s-ko/ 04:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. WMMartin 21:48, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomSlideAndSlip 21:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.