Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The danks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per CSD A7. Naconkantari 17:16, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The danks

ATTENTION! If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}

Band does not appear to pass WP:MUSIC, self-confessedly "up and coming", unsigned, no entries on Amazon or Allmusic. Nominated for AfD as db-band tag keeps getting removed. ~Matticus ^T_C 15:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

• Update Adding duplicate article The Danks to this AFD. NawlinWiki 16:39, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. 304.66.123.6. 15:16, 22 August 2006 (UTC) (user's only edit)
• Delete per nom. -- Szvest 15:23, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, no notability asserted. NawlinWiki 15:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Why delete a page just because you don't know about it? Give it time and maybe the correct details will be added.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.250.145.62 (talk • contribs) . (user's only edits are to the article (including blanking the AFD tag) and this discussion)
• Speedy delete. I see no justification in the removal of the db-band tag- this article is precisely why we have it. --Wafulz 15:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep per comments above. Metrocard. 15:58, 22 August 2006 (UTC) (user's only contributions are to this AFD discussion)
• Delete per nom. Pathlessdesert 16:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Michael Greiner 16:04, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per NawlinWiki and Wafulz. Note to the anon who continues to blank opinions s/he doesn't like: the closing admin will look at the page history and see all the comments made despite your attempts to remove them. Please make legitimate arguments rather than removing others' arguments. Srose (talk) 16:12, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom -- Whpq 16:13, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Kukini 16:14, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per 71.250.145.62, even if it's an IP.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by TD82206 (talk • contribs) .This is user's first contribution. His other contribution matches an article of one of the IPs also posting here.
• Speedy delete Is there any assertion of notability aside from (I'm paraphrasing here) "If you listen to this band, you'll really, really like them!"? -- Kicking222 16:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete No assertion of notability. Also, keep an eye on this page; an anon just tried to close it "per WP:SNOW." --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 16:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per nom --Geneb1955^Talk/_CVU 17:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.