Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The church's opinion on alcohol
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:08, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] The church's opinion on alcohol
Article has little substance, the content is surely covered better somewhere. No redirect vote because of ambiguous title: what church? Punkmorten 10:33, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Obviously, the author has yet to hear of communion. Delete. Capitalistroadster 10:58, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Better covered in Religion and drugs, History of alcohol and Abstinence. --Squiddy 11:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - ambiguous article, apparent biased POV B.Wind 11:06, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per Squiddy. Jamie (talk/contribs) 11:15, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. This is by User:Tonyk23, whose prior articles were all copyvios. This is an improvement: it may be deletable, but at least it's original content. Jamie (talk/contribs) 11:15, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- That provides us even more grounds for deletion. -- SoothingR(pour) 11:23, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. In the spirit of Wikipedia:Don't bite the newbies, the article should be deleted on its own mertis (or lack thereof – I already voted delete), and not those of the author. If he has moved on from copyvio to POV nonsense, he may progress to valuable contributions (or at least solid stubs) at some point. He's only been with us a few weeks. Jamie (talk/contribs) 14:09, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- That provides us even more grounds for deletion. -- SoothingR(pour) 11:23, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. This is by User:Tonyk23, whose prior articles were all copyvios. This is an improvement: it may be deletable, but at least it's original content. Jamie (talk/contribs) 11:15, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per squiddy. Agnte 14:28, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per aboive. Unfortunately, there are many who regard their own church as "christian" and any other (but particularly Catholic) as "non-Christian. This may be one example. Jtmichcock 22:20, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Could be useful topic if covers all churches but this is just rant. Pavel Vozenilek 23:22, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete r3m0t talk 00:03, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. John 2: 6-10. Grutness...wha? 05:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per Grutness. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:32, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete This article does not express the views of the majority of Christian churches. Even if it did it would be better as a subheading on another Christian page. —gorgan_almighty 16:15, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- delete "obviously". Gaius Cornelius 17:42, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete lol - FrancisTyers 16:31, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - My Christian Church uses consecrated wine. Endomion 16:33, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.