Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The "Super Stunt"

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Viridae^Talk 07:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The "Super Stunt"

The "Super Stunt" (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The only source for this article appears to be a claim on the perpetrators website. Delete unless reliable sources are found.-- JeremyA 02:10, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

• I agree. It is false self recognition, and deserves to be deleted. It is exploiting wikipedia and contributing false information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.115.161.98 (talk • contribs).
• Strong Delete So let me get this right - this is an article for a stunt which may or may not have happened, didn't work properly if it did, and even if it had, the perpetrator won't say what it was? Doesn't sound *too* encyclopedic to me, oddly. EliminatorJR 02:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
• The statements on the page are completely false and only a marketing ploy. Delete unless any other use is found.-- Cracker917

• Both Cracker917 and the unsigned above (63.115.161.98) have repeatedly and abusively vandalized the article. Their input in this matter should be disregarded. Notmydesk 03:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. ConDem^Talk 02:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per all above no reason to have this article on hereOo7565 03:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - definitely not encyclopedic content. --Haemo 04:04, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
• Smerge to zug.com and Cockeyed.com. Don't need the whole write-up here, just a line or two like what's already in the article. --Dhartung | Talk 04:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
• To all you haters, explain why http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yale%27s_%22We_Suck%22_Prank stays then. Yah, thought so... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.71.44.116 (talk • contribs).
  • It is attributed to 9 reliable sources. —JeremyA 05:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. C56C 06:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 06:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per EliminatorJR. Sr13 (T|C) ^{Editor review} 06:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.