Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wall (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 01:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Wall (video game)

The Wall (video game) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable video game, seems to be as hory article due to the WP:CRYSTAL nature. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 02:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete; I think it's fairly clear that when basically all fields of the infobox are "TBA" there's a WP:CRYSTAL problem (as well as unestablished notability). — Coren ^(talk) 02:46, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: Only for the sole reason that it is not notable and we can't predict... would like to see this back eventually, though. - Kneel17 03:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Dont those IGN articles talk about the game? I think info is available due to their appearance at E3 Corpx 05:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. All those TBAs in the infobox say crystalballery to me. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 06:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Its not notable at all. (Woggy 06:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC))
• 'Delete Definitely fails WP:CRYSTAL and WP:N No prejudice to recreation if notability can later be established. Rackabello 07:34, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - and recreate once it appears (looking at Duke Nukem Forever this can take a while..) and notability can be established with independent reliable sources. --Allefant 13:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.