Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Vincent Black Shadow
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KEEP. The puppetry is annoying, but the Keep argument is still the stronger. Herostratus 07:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Vincent Black Shadow
Doesn't appear to satisfy WP:MUSIC, as there's no indication that their release is notable, and their record label is itself of very questionable notability (and even if sufficiently notable, cannot be said to be a major label by any means). Delete. --Nlu (talk) 18:51, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
KEEP - Performed on all 50 Warped Tour dates; also toured in Germany. Was Fuse TV's #1 video over Panic at the Disco, Timberlake, and others (not sure if this is significant enough). Lead singer hosted presented award/hosted Fuse TV's Chainsaw Awards (once again not sure is significant enough). --piff133 02:41, 17 January 2007
KEEP Watching their music video right now on MTV Hits, which is also available on the DVD for the horror film Feast. I'd say that's notable enough. --User:pogonrudie 3:48, January 17th, 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.199.243.254 (talk • contribs)
- Strong Keep Seems like a notable band by reading the article and by reading the above comments. semper fi — Moe 20:27, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- Does it affect your vote that piff133's only two edits are to this AfD discussion and that 63.199.243.254 forged a signature from pogonrudie? --Nlu (talk) 03:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- No it doesn't. Despite the fact that either:
- 1) Piff133's only edits to Wikipedia is this AFD
- 2) 63.199.243.254 "forged" a signature (I doubt he tried to forge it, he was probably logged out and commented under his IP)
- 3) Or that Piff1333 and Pogonrudie/63.199.243.254 may be the same user. Either way, I still think the band deserves an article.
- But I do suggest that we slap a {{expand}} template on it so that people interested will cleanup an expand what we do have. Some of the comments above make it seem like we are possibly missing information on this band that may be worth noting. If you like, whenever I get the chance, I will try to work on it myself. semper fi — Moe 12:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- No it doesn't. Despite the fact that either:
- Does it affect your vote that piff133's only two edits are to this AfD discussion and that 63.199.243.254 forged a signature from pogonrudie? --Nlu (talk) 03:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Satisfies WP:V although I don't appreciate the apparent sockpuppetry above. Note the all caps. House of Scandal 13:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
