Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Village of Outcasts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Deleted by Marudubshinki as ('nother copyvio). -- JLaTondre 02:13, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Village of Outcasts

Contested PROD. Full text of some kid's novel (whose only other edit is the speedyable Caleb Fair) which would fall under WP:OR at the least, and WP:NOT a free webhost/soapbox/text dump. Delete. Kinu ^t/_c 20:04, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

• Also part of this AfD if it doesn't get deleted via PROD first: The village of Outcastes. Same great content, new great spelling.
  • Comment: I'd even support speedying both as vandalism, if possible. While one must assume good faith, the user had already been warned several times about removing speedy tags on his bio article, and it's possible these were created in retaliation, since one would normally tread lightly after getting a few unhappy messages on their talk page. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Joe 20:09, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete patent nonsense - if not speedy then it ticks a lot of WP:NOT boxes. nnvanityfictionspam Politepunk 20:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, as nonsense - an imaginary novel? Kuru ^talk 21:10, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, unique mind indeed. --Deville (Talk) 22:33, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 04:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.