Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Used 3rd studio album

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 19:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Used 3rd studio album

The Used 3rd studio album (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Crystal balling an album. Right now there's very little information (the album is not named). Delete and recreate if and when the album is released and gets press coverage. Wafulz 23:24, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

• Apparently the article was moved to Berth (album) since I started the AfD. --Wafulz 04:01, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Also nominating:

• Berth (album), a duplicate article (right down to the AfD too)
• Handsome Awkward, a potential single from the album. Everything in each article is speculation.--Wafulz 04:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete clear crystal-balling--Velvet elvis81 23:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above--Tainter 00:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
• Comment This debate is confusing. I came to it through Berth (album), but when I clicked on this, it said only The Used 3rd studio album was nominated. Then, when I checked the The Used artice to see where both pages stood on the discgraphy, I saw it only linked to the latter and linked to Berth (CD/DVD), but not the former. Then when I checked what linked to the former, I saw only Handsome Awkward and DumbBOT's archive on the listing. So which page is correct, Berth (album) or The Used 3rd studio album? And are you nominating one of them or both? --Machchunk | make some noise at me 05:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
  • I wasn't aware of the other articles. I think Handsome Awkward and Berth (CD/DVD) are unrelated topics. --Wafulz 04:01, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
    • I think I'll nominate Handsome Awkward too actually. This is all confusing- the creator went around and started three articles and essentially crystal-balled them all. --Wafulz 04:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Merge to The Used. The only usable reference simply states that their next album is due in 2007, so make a mention of that on the band's page and delete this one. —ShadowHalo 03:56, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

• Relister's comment: Please now also comment on Berth (album) and Handsome Awkward, which have not yet been discussed. Note that Berth (album) was apparently cloned (not moved) from The Used 3rd studio album with the AfD tag already in place. Sandstein 07:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• Comment There is a growing trend of speculative articles about upcoming media releases with placeholder names like "upcoming studio album". Is there policy against such articles (if nothing else, it would prevent a clutter of "untitled" redirects being left behind)? Should there be? –Unint 16:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Yes, there is. --Wafulz 21:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
    • I am aware of WP:CRYSTAL (as if it were possible to come to this page and be unaware). I was hoping for some kind of edict against creating articles for yet-untitled things specifically (as it stands, WP:CRYSTAL technically doesn't apply to the particularly well-sourced ones). –Unint 23:57, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, non notable, one album that may be released does not satisfy WP:MUSIC -- Chris 73 | Talk 22:50, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.