Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Unfunny Truth About Scientology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 20:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Unfunny Truth About Scientology

Non notable website.

Most of this article is a regurgitation of the contents of the website, along with other filler material on Scientology controversies. There is no assertion of the significance of the website what so ever. The only claim as to notability is that "it has been spread across the internet by users of many popular websites and search engines including Google.com, and Digg.com." Appearing on a search engine hardly makes a website notable.

Basically the article says: "Look, we've made a site about scientology. It appears on google. Scientologists have sued other sites, perhaps they'll sue ours". By that logic I could criticise scientology on my website and then be immediately entitled to write a wikipedia article about it. Delete

--IslaySolomon 04:45, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect to YTMND. Danny Lilithborne 05:51, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This is not likely to be a search term, and the overwhelming majority of YTMND sites are not notable. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 06:07, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete It looks like a fanboy article to me. Lurker 09:58, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn website promo KleenupKrew 10:45, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect as above Feedyourfeet 11:28, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No redirect. YTMND cruft. -- GWO
• Delete WP:SPAM Ste4k 20:08, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable. I'll change my vote to "keep" when Tom Cruise jumps up and down on the couch again and sues them. --NMChico24 22:30, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. SM247^{My Talk} 01:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete even if Cruise sues. KillerChihuahua^?!? 13:23, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable, and unlikely to become notable, unless a legion of Scientologists crashes the site and the U.N. steps in (in other words, never.) Grandmasterka 07:05, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.