Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Umbro Galway Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. KrakatoaKatie 13:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Umbro Galway Cup

Non-notable competition. Returns 64 ghits. Claims are spurious and misleading - the Glasgow Celtic team involved, for example, is the academy team, not the first team or even the reserves. Bubba hotep 11:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Not relevant to anyone except participants of the competition. As per nom. - jlao ⁰⁴ 11:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Yes, it is not the first Celtics team, not even reserves, because it is YOUTH'S tournament. "The tournament includes age groups from Under-11 to Under-17 and there is a group for a girls' Under-15 tournament". Don't say that you are expecting Celtics first team to play at U-11 tourney??? LOL. -- Encyclopaedia Editing Dude 12:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment -- I see you seek to discredit my statement by adding the word "Academy" before the names of teams in the list and then making out that I hadn't read it. It wasn't there before and I stand my my original statement that it gave misleading claims of notability. And I see from the rest of the voters that there may be issues of "conflict of interest". Bubba hotep 19:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment -- I don't seek to discredit you, I'm just trying to improve article. If you find something misleading, you should try to fix it, instead nominating for deletion. Anyway, article clearly says it's youth tournament. -- Encyclopaedia Editing Dude 19:33, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment -- if I find something which I deem to be non-notable, what is the point of trying to improve it? That is ultimately what this forum is about. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. I will admit it without any further prejudice and we will carry on. Bubba hotep 19:46, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Could do with a bit more text but I don't see any fundamental problem here. BTLizard 13:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, or follow the logic and delete all amateur and youth sport. Emeraude 18:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Hear Hear. All the things I have added have been concerning such topics, and I feel I am being antagonised when every little thing I add, gets tagged, when clearly there are other, certainly less notable things on the site. Also, it helps the progression of such things when there is more information available on the topics.Ryannus 18:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment -- do you mean advertise them, then? Bubba hotep 19:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment -- No, It is not advertising. You seem to be looking for faults, instead of accepting that I have tried to contribute information. I even provided a reference to the site, so you could see what it was. Now, I fel that it was a bad judgement on your part to nominat it for deletion. Doing this to every new article you find does not make you a good admin.Ryannus 19:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment -- and by "being antagonised when every little thing I add, gets tagged" - do you mean this conversation we may or may not have had the other day. The similarities are striking, but I apologise if I'm wrong: User talk:RyannusK. I will reiterate, I am not on a vendetta. Pages happened to crop up when I was patrolling the new pages and it happened to be them. And, by the way, I'm not admin. Bubba hotep 19:45, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Competition and clubs competing very notable in Irish sport. Dodge 01:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.