Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Town of Odyssey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The only keep comments were from editors who dropped by only to contribute to this AfD --Steve _(Stephen) ^talk 09:55, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Town of Odyssey

The Town of Odyssey (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

• Non-notable per WP:WEB, no evident third-party sources. Phantoon 18:58, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• Rather then outright deleting it, perhaps some select info should be included in the page about Adventures in Odyssey, and then delete this one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.129.148.188 (talk) 19:04, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• I don' think it should be outright deleted- it's a very important site to some people, and it is incorperated with Adventures in Odyssey, it can be a sub-link for it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mj skywalker (talk • contribs) 14:23, 5 May 2007

• Delete per WP:WEB, content is ludicrously trivial (i.e. a list of forum moderators). An external link in the main article would be okay, and I see that's already in place. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:18, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Somewhat indiscriminate and trivial content failing WP:WEB. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 21:42, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

• I don't think it should be deleted. This site is only 40% Adventures and Odyssey, the other 60% is an online town, with money, jobs, elected leaders. And this site helps the new people learn about it. Jtmcgee 12:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

• Don't delete It's an article providing information about a very popular website. Important information. And this site has hundreds of members, and if this is an encyclopedia then it should be a place for people to learn about these 400 people, and what a site they visit is. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.179.138.54 (talk) 01:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.