Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tony Danza sex move
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. DS 23:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Tony Danza sex move
Delete unverifiable sexual-stunt-cruft. Author removed prod tag. Zetawoof(ζ) 21:11, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete with prejudice. The edit history of the page suggests a misogynistic bent, too. --Elkman - (talk) 21:15, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -- WP:NN. We can include it when the NYT publishes a feature in the lifestyle section. --rehpotsirhc
21:19, 17 April 2006 (UTC) - Keep! Don't censor my firend's page, yall! This is important to young people who think this is notable and funny! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smellmyfinger (talk • contribs)
- Then put it on uncyclopedia. Fourohfour 22:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Uncyclopedia wouldn't want it; it is unfunny. Try Urban Dictionary which I am sure already has an entry. Kotepho 22:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Some naughty person has done a rather unkind redirect for unfunny :-) (That having been said, I'm still going to be a spoilsport and propose the unfunny article for speedy deletion) Fourohfour 22:32, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Then I'll have to use a piped link to make a joke like that! Kotepho 22:55, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Some naughty person has done a rather unkind redirect for unfunny :-) (That having been said, I'm still going to be a spoilsport and propose the unfunny article for speedy deletion) Fourohfour 22:32, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Uncyclopedia wouldn't want it; it is unfunny. Try Urban Dictionary which I am sure already has an entry. Kotepho 22:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Then put it on uncyclopedia. Fourohfour 22:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Chairman S. Talk 21:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as non-verifiable, to say the least. --Lockley 21:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. This is Wikipedia, not an alt.sex.stories.* newsgroup. Doctor Whom 21:50, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep What about the vfd template? Jordanmills 21:33, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - whilst Google is not the be all and end all of verifiability, the fact that virtually *no* proper references to "Tony Danza sex move" can be found there (beyond those that ultimately refer to the Wikipedia article) seems pretty damning to me. Fourohfour 22:07, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment - There are actually quite a few references. IMHO none of them pass WP:NN. --rehpotsirhc 22:34, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - There are actually quite a few references. IMHO none of them pass WP:NN. --rehpotsirhc
- Delete no wiktionary. Kotepho 22:21, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't see any reliable references among the Google hits, and a disturbing number of those hits are Wikipedia quotes. --Allen 23:00, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as unencyclopedic and non-notable. Bucketsofg 23:01, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep useful and notableJordanmills 23:16, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
