Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tide Is In

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Tide Is In

The Tide Is In (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Put simply, candidly, and concisely, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Sr13 (T|C) 03:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. A rumor is not a source. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 03:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as crystalballery. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 04:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as crystalballism. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 08:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep, because sometimes rumors are noteworthy in their own right. --Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? 16:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

  Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? (talk · contribs) just opined "strong keep" in 27 AFD discussions over a period of 35 minutes, several times with clearly disruptive rationales. Uncle G 16:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

  • OK, WHF, tell us why this rumor is noteworthy. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 19:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as obvious promotion for tangential artist. Setanor 16:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, per WP:CRYSTAL. Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 17:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Acalamari 18:03, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete- as per everyone else...--Cometstyles 18:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.