Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Superfuzz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non admin closure) ——Ryan | t • c 13:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Superfuzz

The Superfuzz (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Does not satify notability criteria.No citations, and promotional. Abeer.ag (talk) 14:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

• Keep: Errr ... "no citations?" I followed the several citations listed at the bottom of the article (and there at the time of the nomination), and as much as it sticks in my craw to say so about an unsigned band without releases, they check out. Several are to reliable sources which go indepth about the band, as WP:V requires. That they might not clear WP:MUSIC is trumped by the inescapable fact that they clear WP:V. The article is certainly promotional in style and a bit of a mess, but that's a content dispute inappropriate for AfD.  RGTraynor  15:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep I feel they meet WP:MUSIC#C1 for this, this, and this. Possibly WP:MUSIC#C7 too, but that one would be a stretch.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 22:58, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:50, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. The is an NPOV, non-promotional article about a notable band that is popular in New Delhi music circles, as well as in the underground Indian music scene. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 18:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.