Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Success of Open Source

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. east.718 at 02:01, November 27, 2007

[edit] The Success of Open Source

The Success of Open Source (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod. This book fails to meet the criteria of Wikipedia:Notability (books). Lacking any commentary from reliable sources, this article should be deleted and the existing mention of the book in the article Steven Weber (professor) could be expanded if there were any material to add. The article on Steven Weber (professor) is already very short, and no case has been made that an unsourced book article needs to exist in addition to the author article.

For Wikipedia:Notability (books) , note the requirement that The book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself, with at least some of these works serving a general audience. The publisher's own web page is not a reliable source, and the award the book is said to have won is hardly a major literary award like those listed in Category:Literary awards. EdJohnston (talk) 03:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete: Per the nom. This book does not meet notability guidelines for books. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Edjohnston did a great job explaining why this should be deletedBalloonman (talk) 07:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per the nom. Mikemill (talk) 15:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. -- M2Ys4U (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Tim Ross·talk 20:14, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.