Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Strudel Noodles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. NSLE _(T+C+CVU) 03:23, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] The Strudel Noodles

Non-notable music ensemble achieving 20 search results [1], the first of which is Myspace.com. Delete. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 01:38, Dec. 17, 2005

• Delete per nom. Alr 01:56, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom -- p_b1999 ^{(Talk|Contribution)} 02:38, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep <remove personal attack>. The mere fact of something's existence makes it worthy of inclusion. Kurt Weber 02:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as part of the fight against inclusionist vandalism. The mere fact that my Internet forum exists does not make it worthy of inclusion. Ashibaka tock 03:02, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:MUSIC --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 03:04, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:MUSIC. Please take care in accusing editors of vandalism when they are following established voting guidelines. Also note WP:Point. Durova 03:07, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per WP:MUSIC and WP:NOR. —Slicing (talk) 03:10, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This band fails to meet any criteria in WP:MUSIC. Movementarian 04:16, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. I am an inclusionist. To me it doesn't mean that we never delete anything. It means that we tend to keep more things than people described as deletionists. Obviously things with no notability, which this group has, for all intents an purposes, should not be in an encyclopedia. Logophile 09:26, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, fails notability standards. User:Zoe|^(talk) 01:43, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Zoe really did write that Uncle G 19:00, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Um, yes, was there some question? User:Zoe|^(talk) 23:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
      • Well, saying "keep this because it fails to meet my standards" is a little odd. It's the sort of thing you more often expect to see because someone has edited other peoples' comments and replaced "delete" with "keep". --Stormie 05:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:MUSIC, no assertion of notability. --Stormie 02:40, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Zoe. -- JJay 19:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - waste of bits (actual policyesque reasons for deletion already stated by others). -- Cyrius|✎ 19:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.